English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I usually use a phrase such as:

(1) I ordered us a box.

Would it be more correct to say:

(2) I ordered for us a box.

Or, better still:

(3) I ordered a box for us.

Example 3 sounds the most correct, but are 1 and 2 improper English or are they perfectly valid in written form?

share|improve this question
1  
#2 sounds a bit central European, say, Yiddish? But it is not standard English. Could be some regionalism too. – Mitch Nov 27 '12 at 18:35
    
@Mitch, I upvoted your comment, because I think you are correct in your assumptions :) – Michael Goldshteyn Nov 27 '12 at 20:44
up vote 7 down vote accepted

(1) and (3) are equally grammatical, but (2) is ungrammatical. Order is a ditransitive verb, which means it can be followed by an indirect and a direct object as in (1), but it is possible to replace the direct object with a prepositional phrase, as in (3).

share|improve this answer

protected by Rathony Jun 15 at 8:28

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.