Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Which is more correct:

This rule specifies that an object should be either visible or invisible, but not partially visible.

Or

This rule specifies that an object should either be visible or invisible, but not partially visible.

Is there any rule for that?

Also, should the be be repeated after the or in the second statement?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

It's fine either way. I parse your first example as:

...should be [either [visible] or [invisible]]...

That is, what an object should be is either "visible" or "invisible"; and the second example as:

...should [either [be visible] or [be invisible]]...

Meaning that what an object should do is either "be visible" or "be invisible".

In this syntax, the repeated verb (here be) can be omitted because it's clear from context, however if you have multiple items with mixed verbs, then the verb is required for every item.

share|improve this answer
    
This really just restates my answer, but alright..! –  Noldorin Jan 18 '11 at 15:36
    
@Noldorin: Sort of, but I wanted to try to make the parallel structure more clear. –  Jon Purdy Jan 18 '11 at 23:00
    
Ok, fair enough. I think the truth is even simpler than what you show, but if this helps anyone, then it's all useful. :) (Also, "parallel"? Sorry, I'm only familiar with the mathematical/geometrical definition of that term.) –  Noldorin Jan 18 '11 at 23:14
    
@Noldorin: Yeah, whatever works. And I meant "parallel" in the sense of "analogous", that is, the two sides must match one another. –  Jon Purdy Jan 18 '11 at 23:22
add comment

I would not consider either sentence unusual in form.

The verb phrase should be can be quite acceptably split. (Unlike the more controversial issue of infinitives.) Hence, both forms are grammatically acceptable.

To me, the former is slightly more natural (when speaking), while the latter is essential when you want to use two different verbs in your "either ... or ..." phrase.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.