English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What may be the meaning of the word acceptation for general English usage?

The Merriam-Webster lists primary definition as "1: acceptance; especially : favorable reception or approval" and follows on with "2: a generally accepted meaning of a word or understanding of a concept"

Oxforddictionaries online lists only one definition: "noun a particular sense or the generally recognized meaning (common acceptation) of a word or phrase."

The OAADonline too records just one entry: "(linguistics) the meaning that a word or expression is generally accepted as having".

Would it be acceptable to use the word acceptation in the sense of acceptance, as in: "acceptation/rejection of a paper submitted to a conference"?

share|improve this question
@AndrewLeach :) "generally accepted meaning". – Kris Nov 10 '12 at 9:52
My question is entirely different -- Would you mind if I ask you to give it another read? – Kris Nov 10 '12 at 9:58
You have asked two questions, one at the start and one at the end. The answer to the second question informs the answer to the first. And the second question can't be answered without clarification of exactly what is meant by acceptation in that phrase. – Andrew Leach Nov 10 '12 at 10:00
It's not acceptable in most formal circumstances (newspaper, journal). In informal instances, it's barely recognizable. – Mitch Apr 24 '13 at 19:19

Acceptation has been in use for centuries, but in contemporary usage it seems to have no advantage over acceptance, and the distinct disadvantage that it is unusual, and as such likely to be a distraction.

share|improve this answer
I find this rather strange. You seem to mean acceptation in the sense of acceptance would be a distraction -- certainly not in the sense of "generally accepted meaning". – Kris Nov 10 '12 at 9:54
I was answering your question about whether acceptation would be acceptable in describing a paper submitted to a conference. – Barrie England Nov 10 '12 at 11:02
I would never use it in lieu of "acceptance" vs. "rejection" of a paper for a conference. This is standard parlance in the conference trade, and using "acceptation" would come off as pretentious at best, even more so than using in lieu of. – user21497 Nov 10 '12 at 11:16

I'd be fairly happy for this picture from the Wiltshire Times

Devizes MP at 10 Downing Street

to be captioned "Acceptation of petition at Prime Minister's office" because that is the act of accepting that box of paperwork. I would find it distracting because it's unusual and could equally well — in fact more than equally well — be the acceptance of the petition.

I wouldn't be happy with a sentence like "Our acceptation of the necessity for a new airport depends on [whatever]" because that's not really the same act. That should be acceptance. There's a subtle difference between the physical act in the photo and what is a metaphysical act in accepting a particular philosophical argument, where the necessity is accepted as a fact.

Because that's such a subtle difference I'd far rather keep both of the above as acceptance.

If you're asking about the definition of the word acceptation in a linguistic sense then it means what it means: it's a technical term with a specific definition, "the meaning that a word or expression is generally accepted as having". It wouldn't be right to use acceptance instead of that technical term.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.