Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I elsewhere saw the difference between the two explained thusly: accomplished denoted "completed for someone else's benefit", achieved "completed by oneself". I consider it a one off, but can anyone confirm if there is an implicit superiority in language usage. This would be useful in the positive sense one would say "... an accomplished career".

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

I think you are right to be wondering if there is a difference, since in my experience (UK English, mostly academic) the two stem-words seem to be used interchangeably to mean much the same thing. If there is a shade of difference in meaning or usage, I guess that accomplish(ed) refers more to polish and style, and achieve(ment) more to overcoming difficulty. Otherwise they both mean to get something done - and finished. I wonder if the poser of the question would like to say whether it is UK- or US- or other English usage that is of greatest interest?

share|improve this answer

I would say that one would accomplish a task and achieve a goal or target. There is considerable overlap between the two.

share|improve this answer
Yes, there's "considerable overlap". But arguably in practice the tasks you accomplish may tend to have been set by others, whereas the goals you achieve might be more likely to have been personal targets. Which might explain where OP's cited source got the idea linking the two verbs themselves to either one's, own or someone else's, benefit. –  FumbleFingers Nov 8 '12 at 21:59

Accomplishment is getting things done, while achievement is getting things done right.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.