Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have read this at the Science.com, and it's in the second line of the last paragraph.

A bow and arrow or an atlatl allows users to attack prey—and enemies—from a safer distance than does an ordinary spear.

I would have put it this way: A bow and arrow or an atlatl allows users to attack prey—and enemies—from a safer distance than an ordinary spear does.

So here are my questions:

  1. Are both of the two sentences right?

  2. When can I put the verb ahead of the noun? When is it a necessity?

share|improve this question
    
The verb first actually sounds better to me, unfortunately I'm not really able to describe why. –  Ataraxia Nov 8 '12 at 0:47

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

It is a particular property of the pro-verb do (and also have, when it is a pro-verb, and be).

When one of these auxiliaries is used to stand for a verb phrase which has just been mentioned, after a conjunction like than or as, the verb may precede the subject:

He is going home now, as am I.

I want this to end, as do they.

The inversion is not compulsory, and tends to be associated with more formal or literary language than the uninverted form (your no. 2):

He is going home now, as I am.

There is a parallel with So used to mean also:

So does he!

but in this case, the inversion is compulsory, as without it the meaning will change:

So he does.

means either and therefore he does (whatever) or I am surprised or appreciative that he does (whatever) depending on the intonation; but it has no sense of as well.

share|improve this answer
2  
There is this Germanic left-branching tendency to replicate items backwards at the end of a sentence. Tag questions work that way, don't they? Chuck Fillmore once mentioned "a party game in which people English as if it a verb-final language were to speak induced are." –  John Lawler Nov 8 '12 at 1:39
    
@John Lawler: Haha - I like that one! I suppose it's horses for courses, but I'm glad the ordering in my native language doesn't force me to read that many words before I get to find out what's happening (i.e. - the verbs! :). –  FumbleFingers Nov 8 '12 at 2:12
    
Me, too. But over half the languages in the world are standard SOV. It's a very stable configuration. –  John Lawler Nov 8 '12 at 3:28
    
I was never a fan of Reverse Polish Notation. I'm surprised the fraction is "over half the languages in the world". –  Andrew Leach Nov 8 '12 at 6:44
1  
Now I think of it, other auxiliaries such as can and should show this pattern as well, though they're not common after than. –  Colin Fine Nov 8 '12 at 20:18

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.