English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was told not to use contractions in an essay.

My classmate wrote "the argument of Emily" but I preferred "Emily's argument". He disagreed and claimed "Emily's" is a contraction.

share|improve this question
I would suggest that (in this instance, and notwithstanding nico's first sentence) it is a possessive not a contraction – Andrew Nov 4 '12 at 10:56
Your friend is probably confused by the apostrophe. Not everything with an apostrophe is a contraction! – JSBձոգչ Nov 4 '12 at 12:45
JSBձոգչ, It was exactly my point too. – caxekis Nov 5 '12 at 5:08
up vote 9 down vote accepted

"Emily's" can be a contraction – like when you're saying:

Emily's going with us tomorrow.

However, you've used a possessive, which is not the same thing as a contraction.

Remember, if you've used a contraction, you should be able to split the word back into two:

Emily is going with us tomorrow.

But you can't do that with "Emily's argument."

So, I could say:

Your friend's wrong.

or, I could say:

Your friend's argument is wrong.

but I'd only be using a contraction in the first case.

share|improve this answer

Well, if one wanted to be very picky, Emily's argument is a contraction of the Old English possessive form -es.

However, unlike the case of something like:

Emily's a nice girl

which would be a contraction of

Emily is a nice girl

the 's is now considered just a suffix and is not really a contraction of any modern English word.

Wikipedia reports:

In Old English, -es was the ending of the genitive singular of most strong declension nouns and the masculine and neuter genitive singular of strong adjectives. The ending -e was used for strong nouns with Germanic ō-stems, which constituted most of the feminine strong nouns, and for the feminine genitive singular form of strong adjectives. In Middle English the -es ending was generalised to the genitive of all strong declension nouns. By the sixteenth century, the remaining strong declension endings were generalised to all nouns. The spelling -es remained, but in many words the letter -e- no longer represented a sound. In those words, printers often copied the French practice of substituting an apostrophe for the letter e. In later use, -'s was used for all nouns where the /s/ sound was used for the possessive form, and the -e- was no longer omitted. Confusingly, the -'s form was also used for plural noun forms. These were derived from the strong declension -as ending in Old English. In Middle English, the spelling was changed to -es, reflecting a change in pronunciation, and extended to all cases of the plural, including the genitive. Later conventions removed the apostrophe from subjective and objective case forms and added it after the -s in possessive case forms.

share|improve this answer
Plus apostrophe-s has been reanalysed as something that goes at the end of the entire NP: a friend of mine’s car. – tchrist Nov 4 '12 at 11:35
@tchrist: good point! – nico Nov 4 '12 at 11:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.