Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm writing a paper. In it, I have the following sentence.

The ________ principle has two discrepancies.

I am considering using either "aforementioned" or "aforesaid". How are the meaning of the two different? The definition for "aforesaid" is

Stated or mentioned before; aforementioned.

The definition of "aforementioned" is

Previously mentioned, esp. in a text.

Are their meanings different? When should I use which?

share|improve this question
    
You have "aforestated" in your title, but in the question you mention "aforementioned" and "aforesaid." I'd use "aforementioned in a paper, though I can't tell you why. –  JAM Nov 3 '12 at 19:50
1  
I'd probably choose aforementioned in that case, and it seems this is increasingly becoming the popular choice –  Jim Nov 3 '12 at 19:51
    
@Jim: That Ngram uses the word "principle", but that's probably not a good way to really see how often the words are used. After all, there could be an aforementioned theorum, an aforementioned axiom, an aforementioned lemma, etc. –  J.R. Nov 4 '12 at 0:57
    
@J.R.- yes, it was not my intent to see how aforementioned was used in general, but rather how it was used with principle. I felt that coupling it might help eliminate some of the other forms/phrases that might creep in in a more general search. If my intention was to compare relative frequencies of use, you are correct that adding principle would not be the way to do that. –  Jim Nov 4 '12 at 1:34
1  
Is there a reason that you can't just say "this principle ..." instead of "the aforementioned principle ..."? It's kind of what "this" means. –  user16269 Nov 4 '12 at 9:57

3 Answers 3

up vote 5 down vote accepted

They make you sound like a lawyer, and I wouldn’t use either. Try The principle (I have) already mentioned or The principle referred to above.

share|improve this answer
1  
It depends on the context, I think. I've seen aforementioned rather often, particularly in proofs, or in papers where one principle keeps building upon another. Your suggestions are good for those times when you only need to refer to something previously mentioned once or twice, but aforementioned can be a concise way to say it if you need to express that notion several times throughout a scientific paper. –  J.R. Nov 4 '12 at 1:02

I find the supercited aforementioned to be way too complicated. It tends to raise eyebrows, and not just superciliously, either. More like supersilliest, perhaps.

You could just call it the stated principle, or (unless this form bothers you too much), the above principle.

Just don’t use supercited. :)

share|improve this answer

said implies speech.

If one points out "but that was written and not said" in case you use a speech-related expression in relation to a text, it's pointless nitpicking, but it's the kind of nitpicking easily avoided by using a generic, non-speech-related expression like mentioned instead.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.