Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Does that kind of numbering style have a common name or names? To be fair, it is really more of an "identifier" since it certainly not a scalar (one-dimensional) number. It isn't fair to call it a floating point number either.

If I were to hazard two guesses, I would say:

  • a document identifier (but that seems so vague)
  • a multi-dotted number (silly, yes, but it gets the points across)

So in reality, I've got nothing.

share|improve this question
    
Dear editor: could you remove the "single-word-request" tag? I don't require answers with only a single word. –  David James Oct 25 '12 at 17:29
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

I think "section number" makes sense.

Interestingly, Wikipedia's page on Section Numbers redirects to ISO 2145:

International standard ISO 2145 defines a typographic convention for the "numbering of divisions and subdivisions in written documents". It applies to any kind of document, including manuscripts, books, journal articles, and standards.

So, this standard defines the number format I'm looking for. Great. (Note that to satisfy this standard, only Arabic numerals can be used; letters and roman numerals are outside this particular definition.)

share|improve this answer
    
+1 You got the right thing there! You could actually answer the question like: It is the International standard ISO 2145, "numbering of divisions and subdivisions in written documents". "2145" for short. (It applies to any kind of document, including manuscripts, books, journal articles, and standards.) –  Kris Oct 26 '12 at 6:42
add comment

You might try numbered multilevel list or outline numbered list.

From Microsoft Word 2010 Complete by Pasewark et al. (p. WD 124):

A multilevel list is a list with two or more levels of bullets or numbering. A numbered multilevel list is sometimes called an outline numbered list.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Even though, when we hear the word decimal, we might instinctively think of only one decimal point in a number (as in 3.14159265358979), the format you refer to is called a decimal outline.

In addition to the Wikipedia link just provided, the Purdue OWL uses the same terminology, as shown at the end of this handout. This guideline also uses the term decimal outline.

With that in mind, I'd have no problem with someone referring to the 3.2.1 as a decimal identifier, decimal header, or decimal section ID – certainly not in that context – and I don't see any need to specify multi-, as in multi-dotted number.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, but I was asking for the format of the number. A decimal outline describes the whole outline, not the format of the number / identifier itself. You mention some particular ways that people could refer to the identifiers, but I think you are just commenting on what sounds good to you. I'm hoping to find terms that are actively used. –  David James Oct 25 '12 at 17:18
    
@DavidJames: After reading your clarification to jlmcdonald above, I have to ask, what would be wrong with Section Number (or, Section Identifier)? I realize you're looking for an "official" designation, and I'll probably research this some more, but I can't see where one could go wrong Section Number - not if the document says "Section 3.2.1". –  J.R. Oct 25 '12 at 18:05
    
Yes, section number works for me. I posted an answer with that, below. :) –  David James Oct 25 '12 at 18:25
add comment

The Chicago Manual of Style calls the actual instantiation of such an identifier a "numbered subhead" or sometimes a "numbered division" or "numbered section." It also points out that this particular style of referencing the various sections is called "multiple numeration." See section 1.55 for more info.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks. To clarify, I'm looking for a term for "3.2.1" not the entire "Section 3.2.1". –  David James Oct 25 '12 at 17:21
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.