Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Possible Duplicate:
What is the proper use of [square brackets] in quotes?

This question is born of practical necessity - one that I encountered while quoting a reference in "another" Stack Exchange property's "comment field". Due to space limitations, I had wanted to "paraphrase" the following line..

This is why Git will only let you checkout another branch if everything is checked in – there are no uncommitted modified files.


This is why all changes must be committed before switching branches.

This did allow my post fit nicely - into the properly dignified amount of allowed characters - but left me with only two spaces to spare. With those two, I reluctantly surrounded my mini-edit in ( ) (parenthesis). This is fine, and all... but as the change was mid-quote, and mid-paragraph, there was no obvious way to clarify that this parenthetical portion was NOT as the credited author had intended - but was instead MY little handiwork.

A quick glance about found a dearth of good suggestions on how best to propery attribute - or even indicate - occurances of such paraphrasing, short of some kind of annotated bibliography, etc. What is the correct way to do this (syntactically, via a symbol, or with punctuation, etc.), especially in the context of modern / informal / electronic communications?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by FumbleFingers, Kris, Matt Эллен, MετάEd, tchrist Oct 28 '12 at 16:52

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Square brackets: [ ], if the paraphrase occurs within a passage identified as a quotation. You may make assurance doubly sure with your initials, thus: "To be, or [an alternative - ag], that is the question." –  StoneyB Oct 24 '12 at 21:23
I like it! Post as an answer, cause it sure smells right to me - lest some fancy-pants comes along and schools us both... –  alex gray Oct 24 '12 at 21:28
@Kris a: why does posting to english.SE always have to be so unfun, lol? b: "Squarely" seems a tad dramatic / subjective / pedantic, don't ya think? and c: wow, who knew there WAS such a site (writers.SE)... –  alex gray Oct 25 '12 at 5:16
@alexgray a. ELU only if it is not off-topic b. Yes, it's meant to be dramatic, subjective, and pedantic. So it makes you discover writersSE. c. There you are! Explore. –  Kris Oct 25 '12 at 5:19
Add another comment. –  Matt Эллен Oct 25 '12 at 11:59

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Standard scholarly usage is to enclose a paraphrase or addition occurring inside a passage identified as a quotation within square brackets: [ ]

You may make assurance doubly sure with your initials (or –ed. or –edd. to identify the interpolation as that of the editor or editors), thus:

"To be, or [an alternative –ag], that is the question."

By the same token, if you omit matter within a quotation you indicate this with ellipsis points: .... The newest version of the MLA Style Manual also requires you to enclose the ellipsis points within brackets, to distinguish your omission from the author's use of this mark:

"To be [...] is the question."

If youdunnit, bracket it.

share|improve this answer
What'll you give me not to mention the possible use of square brackets in material you're re-quoting? –  Edwin Ashworth Oct 24 '12 at 22:37
@EdwinAshworth I don't know anything about that, and I'd like to know. Add an answer and I for one will upvote it. Perhaps you could ask OP to fold it into his question, too. –  StoneyB Oct 24 '12 at 22:59
Quoting material that itself contains lots of punctuation is probably best fully quoted. Omit paraphrasing and explain additions afterwards. Technical material and legal text come to mind, both make use of square brackets frequently. –  Chris Oct 25 '12 at 1:20
@FumbleFingers As Goneril says: Sic, O sic! That is a question of such transcendentally profound triviality it must herald the imminent (and possibly here-immanent) end of Western Civilization. [sic] transit gloria mundi! –  StoneyB Oct 25 '12 at 3:22
I sometimes put quotes in a different colour from that of the main text. It's probably allowed in some style guide or other. –  Edwin Ashworth Oct 28 '12 at 20:09

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.