For instance, if I were to describe someone as being *near-*carnivorous, I'm have the goal of depicting them as being a heavy meat eater that includes very few forms of non-meat based food in their diet as opposed to being one who exclusively consumes meat.
|
|
I'm very much in favour of quasi- for this purpose, but near serves the purpose, as does mostly.
|
|||||
|
|
The prefix peri- may suit
|
|||
|
Even though it means half, it is often used in context to mean "almost", especially in cases when it is applied to non-measurable concepts. Some examples are "semi-automatic firearm", "semi-parasitic creature", or "semi-arid climate". I think that "pseudo-" could work in the context of "near carnivorous". Pseudo means "false" or "mock", so it would not work in all cases as "near". But "pseudo-carnivorous" for some reason sounds more natural to me than "semi-carnivorous". |
||||
|
|
|
I think para- comes closest, when used in the sense of resembling or similar, as in para-military, para-medic or para-legal. Others you might consider in particular contexts are quasi- and crypto-. |
|||||||
|
|
While not a prefix, your instance appears to perfectly describe obligate carnivores. Besides quasi (which I like), you can also consider the prefix cis- which is from Latin cis 'on this side of'. |
|||
|
|
|
According to Wikipedia, English has borrowed presque-isle from the French, to mean a peninsula with an unusually narrow neck. However, this seems to be the sole use of this prefix in English - so far. Carnivorous is essentially a non-gradable (because it classifies) adjective. To get round this fact to describe an animal eating say 98% meat, one could use the construction 'almost exclusively carnivorous'. |
|||
|
|
|
Why not pen-, as in penultimate or peninsula? |
|||||
|


