Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am trying to fill in this sentence:

“My company is looking to ___ a consultant”.

Is the correct term “hire” or is there a different word that is more fitting when talking about a consultant?

share|improve this question
4  
"Hire" is fine. That's what people do when they ask me to edit a paper. They send me the paper, give me a deadline, and pay me for the work. Even temporary work warrants using "hire". Another word is "engage" (= "hire for job" [thesaurus.com]), but that's not particularly American English. "Employ" is a third, but "hire" is probably the most common. –  user21497 Oct 22 '12 at 15:29
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

Hire is appropriate for a consultant, or more generally for any kind of temporary worker. I’ve also heard “bring in/on a consultant” more than once, which sounds good to me—it conveys more of the “stop in for a few and help out” nature of consulting, I think.

share|improve this answer
2  
"bring on"? I'm familiar with "bring in" but not bring on... –  Andrew Oct 22 '12 at 16:41
1  
@Andrew: Bring in also works, and seems to be more common, actually. With on might be a thing pecular to the US, or my area of it. –  Jon Purdy Oct 22 '12 at 16:58
    
I agree with Andrew; for me "bring on" is akin to "bring aboard", implying longer-term employment than "bring in". –  ruakh Oct 23 '12 at 1:34
add comment

Retain is a good word for this, often used in official contexts. Historically, it has been used to refer to the hiring of legal services. That historical context helps emphasise that a specific service has been paid for (rather than a person employed permanently) and that the term of service may be temporary, with a specific goal in mind.

share|improve this answer
    
This isn't quite as good, because in some contexts retain somebody means pay him a (comparatively small) fee not to do the work but to be available if he is needed. –  TimLymington Oct 22 '12 at 21:57
    
@TimLymington That's a valid point. I'd look to make it clear in the surrounding context, or avoid using it if I couldn't. –  itsbruce Oct 23 '12 at 10:44
add comment

I'm a consultant, and I tend to be engaged as one by my clients.

share|improve this answer
add comment

In the UK, we might be more inclined to appoint a consultant.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.