I won’t and I’ll not are both short forms of I will not. Both are used in English.
Are there any situations where one is preferred over other?
I won't is the choice when an emphasised statement or retort is given:
"You must do two hours unpaid overtime tonight."
"I won't! / I will not!" (not "I'll not!"; won't here connotes strong will)
"There's no other way - you'll have to drive the truck through the minefield."
"I won't stand a chance!" (preferred) ("I'll not stand a chance!" sounds weaker)
"I won't inform the police that the man who ran on to the pitch and thumped the player was your brother." (won't stresses my - perhaps concessive - non-involvement; I'll not would be an unemphasised statement of intent)
I'll not is also short for I shall not, but the will / shall complexities seem to be very unresolved and argued over.
Normally, you will use I won't. Only when not is somehow strongly linked to a phrase would you perhaps sometimes leave it as such and simply use I'll rather than abbreviate not. But it is fairly rare. I believe you will find it more frequently in older English. Using I won't always is your safest bet.
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?