Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

But sternly disregarding, shutting our eyes to the glow and grandeur of the general superficial effect, coming down to what is of the only real importance, Personalities, and examining minutely, we question, we ask, Are there, indeed, men here worthy the name?

I haven’t come across this usage before. Why does the writer use capitalisation with a common word and with the verb after a comma?

share|improve this question
1  
I think this is Too Localised. Note that a couple of sentences later, Whitman apparently wrote Are there arts worthy freedom {sic} and a rich people?. Maybe he was just having an "off day". –  FumbleFingers Oct 19 '12 at 20:14
1  
It is singularly ridiculous that this excellent question is going to be closed. How is this "not a real question"? @FumbleFingers Simply because there's an error elsewhere in the document doesn't mean that this usage is too localised (as Jay's answer and the comments attached to it will attest). –  coleopterist Oct 20 '12 at 8:46
    
@coleopterist: I didn't say it's "not a real question" - I said it's "too localised" (though I might have chosen "off topic"). I don't disagree with Jay's answer, but I think this is something of a one-off context, and it's Lit Crit anyway. –  FumbleFingers Oct 20 '12 at 11:07
    
@FumbleFingers Two others have marked this as "not a real question". –  coleopterist Oct 20 '12 at 13:19
1  
How is it "too localized"? One sees this in many works of literature. Even if this was a unique case, surely the fair answer is to say, "Don't make too much of it, the writer is doing something very unusual for this one particular case", then to close the question as unworthy of an answer. –  Jay Oct 22 '12 at 13:37
show 5 more comments

2 Answers

up vote 13 down vote accepted

He capitalizes "Personalities" for emphasis.

He capitalizes "Are" because it is the beginning of a quoted sentence. He omits the quotation marks but still capitalizes the first word of the sentence. (I sometimes do this myself when I have many short quotes, as all the quote marks can clutter up the text. Now I have a recognized authority to justify it.)

share|improve this answer
    
Yes, these are both pretty standard 19th century uses. The quotes are very often omitted when it is the writer's question or statement or whatever rather than a quotation from someone else. –  StoneyB Oct 19 '12 at 18:38
3  
@StoneyB Word processing and hypertext make us all masters of italics and boldface in ways that our Forebearers had to forswear. Try 18th century authors for serious dose of mid-sentence capitalization. –  bib Oct 19 '12 at 19:01
2  
@bib Boldface indeed is a product of putting typographical tools into the hands of people who don't know how to use them; the pre-PC equivalent was in manuscript one or more underscores. But the use of italics for emphasis or distinction goes back to at least the beginning of the 17th century. –  StoneyB Oct 19 '12 at 22:11
add comment

Re Personalities: What they said - but even more so.
He says he is about to tell us essentially 'What is the only thing that really matters', and then he tells us. Here the single word 'Personalities' carries the weight of a whole sentence. In the one word he is effectively saying - "The only thing of real importance is 'Personalities' ". To not capitalise it is to risk the reader mentally 'rushing on' past the 'sentence condensed into a word', and then having to retrace their mental footsteps to understand his point.

Whitman is master enough of the language that he could easily have expressed himself far more clearly. Often enough his style is to use a degree of obfuscation, to not let the reader forget his degree of erudition and to put things in such a manner that the putting is, if not of as great import as the content, at least a significant part of what he hopes you will notice. When one achieves a certain level of acceptance such constructs are seen as masterly, impressive, and 'deep'. Lesser mortals, especially 21st century ones, attempting such complex styles are more likely to be seem simply as pretentious.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.