English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is this question grammatical:

Are those a new [object]?

I know that the singular form of that question, "Is that a new [object]?", sound perfectly fine but the collective form of it sounds odd, at least for me?

share|improve this question
No, it is not grammatical. – Mitch Oct 18 '12 at 13:11
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Skip the indefinite article 'a', and you're set.

Are those new shoes?

For collectives, use the singular as you normally would in a non-question.

Is that a new solar system?

Is that a new set of planets?

Are those new planets?

share|improve this answer

First, a basic grammatical point. Copular verbs like be don't have objects. The words that follow them form the complement or, more precisely, the subject predicative.

The normal patterns are, to continue the interrogative construcion:

Is that a new hat?


Are those new shoes?

However, it is just about possible to imagine a native speaker saying:

Are those a new pair of glasses?

Here the plural form of glasses overrides the singular form of a new pair.

share|improve this answer
Yes, the only case I could think of also was the English "dual-with-classifier" e.g. "Are those a new pair of pants"? – Mark Beadles Oct 18 '12 at 14:29

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.