What animal is depicted in this image labelled “weefil”?

|
f vs ſThat’s merely a “long s”, not an f.
Therefore, it is not a weefil but rather a weeſil — meaning of course, a weasel. We can rule out weevil because it has the look not of a bug but of a musteline critter. Here are some examples in various faces — namely, in roman, italic, script, uncial, and blackletter faces — of just how confusing this can sometimes be to the uninitiated:
|
|||||||||
|
|
That's not an F, it's an S. You can tell because the bar doesn't cross the stem. Once you figure that out, it's pretty easy to deduce that weesil is an old spelling of weasel. Plus, the picture is obviously of something weasel-oid. Here's a pretty good overview of the history of the long S in printing, including the rules (or rather, lack thereof) for using long vs. short S: http://www.colonialsense.com/Society-Lifestyle/Signs_of_the_Times/Long_S.php |
||||
|
|
|
Others have already rightfully pointed out that this is a weasel. As a member of the Mustelidae family, it is related to the sea otter. In Maine, these were known as lobsters, which were subsequently driven to extinction by crustaceans now commonly known as lobsters. The last of these old lobsters died in 1980.
Pictured: A "furry old lobster" Full Disclaimer: The second paragraph of this answer is complete fiction. Any factual resemblance is purely coincidental. Both the old "furry old lobster" and modern-day "lobster" are alive and well. |
|||||||||||||||||
|