English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does "this is a routine chapter" mean that there is no creativity in this chapter?


This is a routine chapter. There is almost nothing creative here. I just generalize theorems about funcoids to the maximum extent for (defined below) preserving the proof idea. The main idea behind this chapter is to find weakest theorem conditions enough for the same theorem statement as for above theorems for funcoids.

For these who know pointfree topology: Pointfree topology notions of frames and locales is a non-trivial generalization of topological spaces. Pointfree funcoids are different: I just replace the set of filters on a set with an arbitrary poset, this readily gives the definition of , no need of creativity here.

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by MετάEd, JLG, Mark Beadles, Cameron, Kris Oct 14 '12 at 10:52

Questions on English Language & Usage Stack Exchange are expected to relate to English language and usage within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Generally speaking a "routine" is a set of normal procedures, often performed mechanically. So, yes, there is no creativity in these sort of chapters; but "routine" is also a set piece of entertainment, especially in a nightclub or theater. Thus only context can clarify whether or not in "routine" there is creativity. – user19148 Oct 10 '12 at 19:39
Can you give more context and show the results of your research, please? – Cameron Oct 10 '12 at 19:57
@Cameron: I've added the context – porton Oct 10 '12 at 20:14
"Routine" can also mean "ordinary, plain, unexceptional", as in, "It was just another routine day at the office." The writer might mean that the chapter is dull or mechanical in that sense. I presume he thinks the chapter is of value or why did he include it, but he is warning the reader that this is going to be a dull slog and he just has to get through it. – Jay Oct 10 '12 at 20:42
@Jay: "The writer" is me – porton Oct 10 '12 at 20:53

In general, a chapter being routine need not mean there is no creativity in the chapter; there always are choices to be made about organization, about techniques, about examples.

Note, as JLG suggests, you should ask for some help on Writers Stack Exchange, for advice about problems with the passage. There is no reason for a thesis, technical report, or scientific paper to include, and there is good reason to exclude, sentences or phrases like “There is almost nothing creative here”, “I just generalize”, “For these who know pointfree topology”, “I just replace”, “routine”, or “no need of creativity here”. Instead, the introduction to the chapter might talk about setting up patterns for efficient proof of theorems and about required due diligence in proving generalizations or specializations of theorems, and might mention any subsections of the chapter that contain different or interesting results or proofs.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.