English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
When is it appropriate to use 'that' as opposed to 'which'?

I can't figure out whether to use that or which:

"and initiate collaborative projects that will extend beyond the conference"

or "and initiate collaborative projects which will extend beyond the conference"

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Andrew Leach, Matt E. Эллен, MετάEd, RegDwigнt Oct 4 '12 at 8:33

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Related english.stackexchange.com/questions/78/… – user19148 Oct 4 '12 at 6:40
In what way is this difference from the "related" question? Apparently a duplicate. – Kris Oct 4 '12 at 7:31
There's a relevant entry in the "Community Bulletin" sidebar at the moment, which answers the question. That vs Which: A Pragmatic Approach – Andrew Leach Oct 4 '12 at 7:32

Both are semantically very clear. No difference in understanding.

As mentioned in the page http://www.thefreedictionary.com/which:

It is used to refer to a thing or things mentioned previously to distinguish it or them from others.


This is the book (which/that) you wanted.

Clearly, in the above context, any one could be chosen.

share|improve this answer
I think there are two schools of thought here- one that states the two are interchangeable and one that says they aren't. I am in the camp that says they aren't. Your example requires that. – Jim Oct 4 '12 at 6:30
@Jim, please enlighten us why they aren't interchangeable. – stackoverflowery Oct 4 '12 at 6:38
which should be used to introduce non-restrictive clauses, that introduces restrictive clauses. If you can substitute 'which, by the way,' and it still makes sense then it is non-restrictive and should use which. If the purpose of the word is to distinguish the one you are talking about from others then it is restrictive and should use that. See Robusto's answer here: english.stackexchange.com/a/15216/17956 – Jim Oct 4 '12 at 6:46
I just checked the first seven results from this Google search, and not a-one of them said that the two words were interchangable in that context. Conversationally, I agree, most people wouldn't bother to correct you if you used the wrong word, and the meaning would be clear. Still, this answer is tenuous, in that it could easily create the impression that either one is correct, even in formal writing. – J.R. Oct 4 '12 at 8:10
@J.R. So the translators of the King James Bible and Franklin D, not to say the distinguished authors of 'The Cambridge Grammar', got it wrong? – Barrie England Oct 4 '12 at 8:40

You can use either. Some people may tell you that only that is allowed to introduce a clause of that kind (a definining or restrictive relative clause), but that view is not supported by the evidence. For example, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's (King James Bible) and a date which will live in infamy (Franklin D Roosevelt).

As the authors of 'The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language' (using 'integrated' instead of 'defining' or 'restrictive') write:

Integrated relatives with which are grammatical in all varieties of English.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.