English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Will it be correct to state that a statistical estimator may be biased, or that I must state that the above estimator may have a bias?

Is it acceptable to add the /-ed/ to the word bias in the above conditional future form?

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Bias can be a verb as well as a noun, so it is normal to form its past participle by the addition of -ed as a suffix. May have a bias is possible, but I would guess that may be biased was more frequently used.

share|improve this answer

As noted in wikipedia's Biased Estimator article,

In statistics, the bias (or bias function) of an estimator is the difference between this estimator's expected value and the true value of the parameter being estimated. An estimator or decision rule with zero bias is called unbiased. Otherwise the estimator is said to be biased.

Thus, whether it is correct to state that a statistical estimator may be biased depends on the facts; ie, depends on whether the estimator may be biased, or can be shown to be unbiased.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.