A sentence from my reference book is
He can't adapt himself to being free again.
Why is being used instead of be? Isn't verb form and not verb + ing form used after to?
|
A sentence from my reference book is
Why is being used instead of be? Isn't |
||||
|
|
|
Verbs, when combined with -ing, form nouns. For example:
Both jogging and vitamins are nouns. Consider this sentence, in which environment is a noun:
In the sentence in the question, "being free again" is a noun phrase. Its use as a noun may be clearer in this sentence:
The to+verb form, or the infinitive form of the verb, is not the one being used in the example. In the sentence in the example, to is used not as part of an infinitive but as a preposition. You would be answering the question: What can't he adapt himself to? |
||||
|
|
|
Very simple answer - always use the -ing form and never an infinitive (e.g. - to be) after a preposition. Here to is a preposition. That's really all there is to it. Apart from working out when to is a preposition and when it's part of the infinitive. Good luck. |
|||
|
|
|
There are two issues here. First, when you use the verb itself after to, you are referring to sentences like
in which to and eat are grouped. However in the example sentence, it is adapt and to that are grouped. Second, in the example, being should be used and not be to mean that he already is living in the state of freedom. The sentence
is also valid but has another meaning - he cannot change himself so that he can be free. In this case, to be free should be seen as a phrase. |
|||||||
|