English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What's the antonym of "serendipitous"? I couldn't find any anywhere.

share|improve this question
...Unfortunate? – cornbread ninja 麵包忍者 Aug 30 '12 at 19:24
First, look for the synonyms of "serendipitous", then for antonyms of the results. – Mark Beadles Aug 30 '12 at 19:25
Weird, thesaurus.com/browse/serendipitous?s=t lists all manner of antonyms (which apply to the other definition of "beneficial, favorable", as well). – Zairja Aug 30 '12 at 19:26
It depends on which part of the term you want to oppose - the accidental or the beneficial aspects. – bib Aug 30 '12 at 19:43
Spot on, bib. 'Serendipitous' is a word whose meaning involves both the aspects you mention, and as this is, off the top of my head, quite unusual, excepting compound words, it is unlikely that a word carrying both opposite aspects exists. This property is not polysemy, where one word is used with different but related senses in different contexts - it is a word carrying different aspects in a single context. – Edwin Ashworth Aug 30 '12 at 22:01
up vote 4 down vote accepted

"Unlucky" is almost an antonym, although serendipitous is more specific than just "lucky" and refers to finding good things by accident. "Ill-fated," "luckless" or "star-crossed" might work.

share|improve this answer
Did you mean antonym instead of acronym? – Robusto Aug 30 '12 at 19:36
Yes, yes I did. Thank you for catching that! – Kelly Tessena Keck Aug 30 '12 at 20:02
What does "star-crossed" mean? – qazwsx Aug 30 '12 at 20:22
Cursed, fated for bad things. Like Romeo and Juliet being described as "star-crossed lovers" – Kelly Tessena Keck Aug 30 '12 at 20:28
"Star-crossed" doesn't mean fated for bad things in that context; it simply means blocked or thwarted by bad luck. – Robusto Aug 30 '12 at 21:46

Serendipitous doesn't have a "proper" antonym is because a word that was invented/created in 1754 (per wikipedia - credit to user96494). It was coined by Horace Walpole in a letter. , so it has no etymology and therefor no real antonym. This is also why it is so hard to translate into other languages.

share|improve this answer

Wikipedia offers "zemblanity" as an antonym: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serendipity

Makes sense, but it doesn't roll as pleasantly off the tongue as "serendipity" does; then again, it's not nearly as pleasant an experience.

share|improve this answer
Your answer is slightly misleading, almost suggesting that the term is recognized. It isn't, not yet in any case. Please edit your post and include the relevant citation: "William Boyd coined the term zemblanity to mean somewhat the opposite of serendipity: "making unhappy, unlucky and expected discoveries occurring by design" – Mari-Lou A Nov 3 '14 at 16:35

protected by tchrist Apr 18 '15 at 12:34

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.