English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've done a bit of searching but cannot find a definitive distinction between contemporaneous and simultaneous. I personally use the words interchangeably. Am I correct in doing so?

share|improve this question
up vote 8 down vote accepted

The OED gives these definitions, which look pretty typical to me:

Contemporaneous: Belonging to the same time or period; existing or occurring at the same time.

Simultaneous: Existing, happening, occurring, operating, etc., at the same time; coincident in time.

So "contemporaneous" refers to things that happened in, or are associated with, the same period of time, whereas "simultaneous" refers to things that happened at the same moment.

To put it another way, contemporaneous things were happening at the same time, while simultaneous things happened at the same time.

share|improve this answer
It's the difference between concurrency and synchronicity. – Jim Aug 25 '12 at 22:03

Contemporaneous implies things happening during broadly the same period of time. Simultaneous conveys a greater sense of things happening at exactly the same time.

share|improve this answer

Contemporaneous things, to my mind, normally relates to things that happened in the past at around the same time, for a reasonably sustained period of time.

Simultaneous, to my mind, is less time-specific and is more likely to apply to things that occurred for a short period of time.

Two guns might be fired simultaneously; scientists might have worked contemporaneously.

share|improve this answer

I would guess simultaneously is more precise word than contemporaneously but can be used similarly. For example, when things occur in bullet time (like in the movie the matrix) the clock difference between in time events is minuscule, but when slowed down you see there is a gap. At short distances, the speed of sound and the speed of light are imperceptible, but there is a growing difference (between sight and sound) as distance grows.

share|improve this answer

These two words mean the same thing to me - contemporaneously is used far less and I don't think it's needed.

share|improve this answer
Welcome to EL&U. This site prefers that answers provide explanations, supported with appropriate links or references, rather than expressions of opinion. The Help Center may offer useful guidance on creating helpful answers. – choster Jan 23 '14 at 18:04

protected by tchrist Jun 10 '14 at 19:54

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.