English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have heard that starting a sentence with however is wrong. What are the grounds for this view and is it still held by a majority of pedants?

They would suggest changing

However, some people are beginning to doubt this.


Some people, however, are …


Some people are, however, beginning …

share|improve this question
The prior sentence seems relevant, however, some people are beginning to doubt this. Otherwise, why not remove the however so the sentence is concise - some people are beginning to doubt this. – J.Money Nov 6 '14 at 1:18

The Grammar Girl has a good article on this topic, basically:

It is fine to use however at the beginning of a sentence; you just need to know when to use a comma.

If it means "to whatever extent", don't use a comma:

However wrong it is, I will say it loud and clearly.

If it means "nevertheless", use a comma:

However, I don't give a damn.

share|improve this answer
Nasty ads on that site. – delete Aug 6 '10 at 1:02
But she knows what she's talking about. – Pekka 웃 Aug 12 '10 at 23:12
Note "however" is just a 3-syllable long version of "but". – bobobobo Jan 25 '13 at 19:34
@bobobobo, no—it’s a three-syllable, stronger version of ‘but’. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Aug 20 '13 at 11:56

I think this advice comes from the (somewhat strange) idea that sentences should have one complete idea. If your sentence begins with the conjunction "however", then it's an extension of the idea in the previous sentence and is therefore not a "complete idea". The same reasoning is behind advice not to begin sentences with "or" and "and".

Of course this advice is silly because sentences and "complete ideas" don't always line up, and there's no reason that a conjunction can't join a sentence with the previous one.

share|improve this answer
It bothers me to no end to see sentence fragments beginning with 'And' being published as whole sentences. – oosterwal Feb 2 '11 at 23:47
@oosterwal see my answer here english.stackexchange.com/questions/593/… – nohat Feb 2 '11 at 23:51
I think this is a question of elegance, rather than correctness. Starting a sentence with "however" works fine - but in every case I've encountered, putting it in the middle adds punch. Take the example from Edward Tanguay's answer, "However, I don't give a damn" and rephrase it to "I do not, however, give a damn." That sounds a lot more interesting to my ears. – Chris B. Behrens Nov 21 '11 at 19:39

There is no rational, linguistically valid reason for this rule. It's just a convention promulgated by misguided English writing teachers.

share|improve this answer

Yes. However, it should be done sparingly.

Here's a pretty good writeup:


share|improve this answer
Is also a podcast: traffic.libsyn.com/grammar/grammar058-however.mp3 – Peter Mortensen Aug 13 '10 at 0:22

However you parse the rule, this usage is correct. However, this may not be.

I think both are fine, but they are different cases.

share|improve this answer

Yes, but you cannot start a story with it.

I also believe that there should be no more than one 'however' per three sentences.

share|improve this answer
That looks like a challenge. "However experienced a police officer is, encountering...." "'However,' he said, 'you still aren't marrying my daughter.'" – David Thornley Sep 20 '10 at 18:25

It is acceptable to start a sentence with however. However, according to Strunk & White’s Elements of Style, it may only be used at the beginning of a sentence when it means “in whatever way” or “to whatever extent”. When the word is used to mean “nevertheless”, it may not come first in its sentence or clause.

Strunk & White’s Misused Expressions

share|improve this answer
Strunk & White’s Elements of Style is generally considered a bad source of advice: chronicle.com/article/50-Years-of-Stupid-Grammar/25497 – MετάEd Aug 1 '12 at 19:19
White in particular was a great writer, which is great if you read his fiction, but a pity if you read Elements of Style. If only he'd followed his own advice, it wouldn't have been as compelling and it wouldn't still be in print. With that passage though, there is a double danger as even some of their less questionable advice may not be current. – Jon Hanna Jan 22 '13 at 11:53
Elements of Style isn't grammar. It is style. It says so in the title. To recommend or criticize it as a rule is wrong. – J.Money Nov 6 '14 at 1:02

protected by tchrist Mar 1 '15 at 19:34

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.