English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Are collective nouns always plural, or are certain ones singular?

Should company names be followed by "has" or "have"? It depends on whether a company is treated as a singular proper-noun:

Samsung has gotten itself in a lot of trouble recently.

Or plural proper-noun:

Samsung have stated they don't imitate cooler products.

Are both acceptable?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by RegDwigнt Aug 10 '12 at 11:44

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

@Julien: yes, the tiny exception that is British English. – RegDwigнt Aug 10 '12 at 11:47
up vote 1 down vote accepted

A company is a collective entity. When referring to a company by name, it is the overall entity that is being referenced. It is treated as a single thing for the purpose of verb (and pronoun) agreement.

While there are other collectives that may, at times be treated as a plural to reflect the multiplicty of the participants in the activity or characteristic, even when a company is a conglomerate of many smaller companies, the name use is singular.

Time-Warner collects revenue from all of its subsidiaries.

share|improve this answer
This is true in American English. However, in British English, "TimeWarner collect [...] from their [...]" is unobjectionable. See the question this has been closed as a duplicate of. – RegDwigнt Aug 10 '12 at 11:46
@RegDwight AAA - Thanks for the info on the distinction. – bib Aug 10 '12 at 12:03

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.