Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In the following two examples, what is the difference between the usage of been to and been in? They seem like they have the same meaning but I’m not sure.

-Have you ever been to Florida?
-Yes, I’ve been to Florida many times.


-Have you ever been in Florida?
-Yes, I’ve been in Florida many times.

share|improve this question
    
If you were born in Florida and never left then you've been in Florida but never been to Florida. –  donothingsuccessfully Aug 8 '12 at 18:31
    
@donothingsuccessfully But in that case no-one would have to ask you if you'd ever been in Florida. Unlike the other respondents, I would say the two questions are identical unless there is something in the context which raises the lexical contrast to a semantic level. –  StoneyB Aug 8 '12 at 22:02
    
@StoneyB Have you ever been in Florida? –  donothingsuccessfully Aug 9 '12 at 6:28
    
@donothingsuccessfully Cunning fellow, I see where you're going (and it's not to Florida). I withdraw with respect to remote communications. As a matter of fact, yes, I've been to Florida many times. –  StoneyB Aug 9 '12 at 12:42
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

Been to indicates that you are talking about trips or journeys specifically to Florida. To is a preposition of motion and you are talking about movement towards, and arrival in, Florida.

Been in connotes a stay in Florida (which may be short, or very long, or simply passing through). In denotes position, and you are talking about the state or condition of being located in Florida. It doesn't matter whether you took a trip there or not.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The verb be has different meanings in the two examples. In the first example, be is used with the meaning to go (and leave). In the second, it is being used in its more basic sense of existence, or in this case, living in or staying in a location. The two examples can be reworded as:

Q: Have you ever visited Florida?

A: Yes, I've visited Florida many times.

Q: Have you ever lived in Florida?

A: Yes, I lived there for two years when I was a kid.

I believe that the use of many times in the OP's second example is inconsistent.

share|improve this answer
2  
I disagree that been in implies a stay. Sometimes, it is rather the reverse: if I fly DFW-MIA-SAV and never leave the terminal during my layover, I have incontrovertibly been in Florida, but could not say I had been to it. –  choster Aug 8 '12 at 19:02
1  
@choster That's simply splitting hairs. Besides, in that case, you could just as well have been through Florida :) –  coleopterist Aug 8 '12 at 19:07
    
@choster - If you were asked whether you had been in Florida and you answered simply "yes" based on a terminal layover, the questioner would feel deceived. –  bib Aug 8 '12 at 19:30
    
While many times may be slightly unidiomatic, I am often in London. Most times, I am only in London for a day, if that. –  Andrew Leach Aug 8 '12 at 20:13
    
@AndrewLeach Quite so. But, it doesn't really work as, "Have you often been in London?" or "Have you been in London often?". OTOH, "Have you been in London long?" sounds better. But it changes the meaning of the question quite markedly. The Q&A of "Have you ever been in London?" and "Yes, I've often been in London." also sounds odd. –  coleopterist Aug 8 '12 at 20:31
show 3 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.