English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

With defining relative clauses, there is a different word order according to the status of the relative pronoun in the sentence (that is, it can be either the subject or the object of the relative clause).

  1. The relative pronoun is the subject. The word order is --> subject + verb + object

  2. The relative pronoun is the object. The word order is --> object + subject + verb

Does this rule apply to the non-defining relative clauses as well? Or is there any other rule to follow?

share|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

There doesn’t seem to be any difference between the word order in defining and non-defining relative clauses, as these examples suggest:

Defining, relative pronoun as subject: This is the man who built the house. (SVO)

Defining, relative pronoun as object: This is the man whom I love. (OVS)

Non-defining, relative pronoun as subject: Jack, who is 32 next month, built that house. (SVO)

Non-defining, relative pronoun as object: Jack, whom my sister married three years ago, built that house. (OVS)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.