English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Are collective nouns always plural, or are certain ones singular?
Is “staff” plural?

What is correct? The jury was divided or The jury were divided? I am told that the latter is accurate because all of the jury do not have the same opinion in the particular case. Then, how does the subject verb agreement fit in 'The jury is still out' ? I mean, 'The jury is out' would allude to a situation were the opinion on a matter is (are?) still divided.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by tchrist, Matt E. Эллен, Robusto, kiamlaluno, Mitch Aug 2 '12 at 16:56

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

related: Is staff plural? – Matt E. Эллен Jul 30 '12 at 10:36
Possible duplicates here, here, here. Probably plenty more, too. – tchrist Jul 30 '12 at 15:21

"The jury was divided" is correct. Whenever a collective noun is used, it is treated singular because it is a single group. Also, you're trying to say the group was divided, not each of the members. This is similar to "the crowd was scattered".

Note: British and American English slightly differ in other some types of nouns - for example, in British English, you would say "England are the winners", while in American English, you would say "England is not the winner"

To more specifically answer your question,

enter image description here

"Jury are divided" has never been used. Funnily, seeing this

enter image description here

shows that "jury are" has decreased dramatically since it was first used, but is on a slight rise after 2000. I still feel it is grammatically incorrect, though. And thanks to Matt Эллен for getting me interested in these graphs :)

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the explanation. My question was because of the presence of the collective noun. As regards your note: Your note on British English does not seem to be consistent when the use of the pronoun 'she' comes to play. For example: England 'are' the winners. 'She, now leads the medals' tally. Are the foregoing pair of sentences consistent / correct? – Essen Jul 30 '12 at 8:51
@Essen In your sentence, you are referring to the country. In mine, I'm referring to the English team, not the country. "They now lead..." would be better. In American English, it would be "It now leads..." And no comma after 'She' :P – asymptotically Jul 30 '12 at 8:55
"England is not the winners"? Seriously? They talk like that in America? Today I learnt! – user16269 Jul 30 '12 at 9:03
Oops. Sorry, I meant "England is not the winner" – asymptotically Jul 30 '12 at 9:05
Thanks for pointing out the incorrect placing of the comma. – Essen Jul 30 '12 at 10:49

It's up to you. It seems that treating jury as a singular entity takes preference in literature, although that hasn't always been the case:

Google ngram of "the jury has returned" vs "the jury have returned"

It is important to note that a group's plurality is changeable when it comes to conjugation. Sometimes we take a group to be plural, sometimes we don't. There is no rule. These all work:

  • The jury is still out
  • The jury are still out
  • The staff are revolting
  • The team is leaving the changing room
  • The congregation are singing
  • The management expresses its sympathy

This changes when talking about containers, because we're not referring to the contents, but the singular container:

The biscuit tin is emtpy
*The biscuit tin are empty

share|improve this answer
Wow! Thanks a lot! – Essen Jul 30 '12 at 10:57
The grammar has not changed in British English; your Ngram shows the effects of America growing larger. – Peter Shor Jul 30 '12 at 14:57
@PeterShor Most interesting. – Matt E. Эллен Jul 30 '12 at 15:15
I can't agree that 'there is no rule' (in using singular or plural agreement). Certainly, in the UK we would say "The team was founded in 1922" and not "The team were founded in 1922"; we would also say "The team were all exhausted after the game" and not "The team was all exhausted after the game". The rule is: are you considering the team as a whole, or the individual members (when 'team' is really an accepted shorthand for 'members of the team'). Admittedly, in some cases it is arguable: The family is / are away. 'The jury is out' has surely attained idiomatic (fixed) status. – Edwin Ashworth Jul 30 '12 at 20:58
@EdwinAshworth I would accept there was a rule if you gave me a reason. "The team was exhausted" sounds fine to me. I concede the "The team were founded ..." is wrong, but there are so many exceptions to "are you considering the unit or the individuals?" that that can't be it. – Matt E. Эллен Jul 30 '12 at 21:06

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.