Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In a recent podcast of .Net rocks (at 45 minutes 29 seconds), regarding the future of software craftsmanship, it is postulated that there will be an 'Iron Ring Event' (if I heard it correctly). From the context it seems that this is an event where very bad things happen due to poor workmanship. Is this is a common term? What is its origin? What does it mean?

share|improve this question
You may have misunderstood; see wikipedia re Iron Ring ceremony –  jwpat7 Jul 27 '12 at 19:20
Possibly, I think that is related, and that is all I could find in an internet search, but my transcription of the conversation is "Sometime in the future, I don't know when, there will be an incident, an accident, thousands of people will die. The Iron Ring Event in engineering." This suggests there is some original Iron Ring event, that led to the Iron Ring ceremony. –  AlexC Jul 27 '12 at 19:55
"To err is human, but if you really want to f*** things up, use a computer." –  Robusto Jul 27 '12 at 21:37
Too Localised and/or General Reference. This isn't about use of English as such - it seems to be just a matter of both speaker and listener sharing knowledge of a fairly obscure historical event. Probably specific to Canadians anyway. –  FumbleFingers Sep 6 '12 at 11:34
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 6 down vote accepted

It probably refers to the collapse of the Quebec Bridge:

In 1922, Canadian Herbert Haultain created a ceremony for new engineers. New engineers are asked to recite an Obligation to their profession. They also are given an iron ring to wear on their little finger. The ring is a symbol to new engineers. It reminds engineers of their pride in their profession and their responsibility to safety.

The idea that engineers needed to be more responsible may have come from the Quebec Bridge disaster. The Quebec Bridge collapsed in 1907, killing 75 workers. The cause was an engineering error. In 1917, the rebuilt bridge collapsed. This time, 11 people were killed.

source pdf

Outside of the North American (Canadian, in particular) engineering community, I would be surprised if this were a commonly understood reference. Note that it is about more than just a reference to bad workmanship, it is a reflection on the need for professional responsibility (although based on the context OP provided in a comment, it was probably just a macabre joke).

share|improve this answer
The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree, is by accident. That’s where we come in; we’re computer professionals. We cause accidents.Nathaniel Borenstein –  MετάEd Sep 6 '12 at 14:08
add comment

protected by RegDwigнt Sep 6 '12 at 13:11

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.