Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is it grammatically permissible by the rules of Standard English for the coordinating conjunction ‘yet’ to follow a subordinating conjunction? For example, take the sentence:

Although it is early, yet still I must rise.

This seems to make sense and be correct to me, but if I substitute another coordinating conjunction, say ‘but’, it no longer seems so:

Although it is early, but still I must rise.

It seems that the semantics of ‘but’ are what create a problem here, though instead of the grammar, but I can't seem to form any valid subordinating + coordinating sentence except if I use ‘yet’, so I'm not sure.

share|improve this question
1  
I may be at risk of sounding a fool here, but I don't understand why you'd want to use both. The example you provide is awkward and redundant, and would work better with only one conjunction. –  crisis.sheep Jul 24 '12 at 7:01
2  
@Chris - Have you got permission from the original poster at able2know to repost here? –  Matt Эллен Jul 24 '12 at 7:50
1  
@Matt The Gravatar is identical on the two postings. –  Andrew Leach Jul 24 '12 at 7:56
    
@AndrewLeach — well spotted! I guess there's nothing to worry about then. –  Matt Эллен Jul 24 '12 at 8:20
add comment

3 Answers

I'd argue the problem with the sentence "Although it is early, yet still I must rise" is that "although" and "yet" are redundant. Both imply a contradiction, so only one should be necessary.

Consequently, I'd use either "Although it is early, I must still rise", or "It is early, yet still I must rise".

share|improve this answer
add comment

This is archaic but poetic. It's an example of an anapaestic tetrameter (although it really needs another unstressed syllable right at the start) — four feet of "da da DUM":

But although it is early, yet still I must rise.

As @crisis said, it's redundant, but redundancy can be employed for particular effect, as here.

share|improve this answer
    
Insightful. Thank you. –  crisis.sheep Jul 24 '12 at 8:09
add comment

As a conjunction is a joining unit, it isn't necessary to use more than one for a single purpose. As you mentioned, writing "but" in place of "yet" doesn't sound right. That's because it isn't, and writing "yet" is similarly so.

If there is a sense in which "yet" does fit this context, it is obsolete.

share|improve this answer
    
The Corpus of Contemporary American English has 700 phrases using yet still. –  kiamlaluno Jul 24 '12 at 7:59
2  
Your logic about not using two conjunctions together sounds plausible, and yet seems to me to be missing something. It may be redundant, but when used to good effect, can work well. –  user16269 Jul 24 '12 at 9:06
    
Ha ha. Touché, good fellow. –  crisis.sheep Jul 24 '12 at 9:12
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.