English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I found a set of examples where I expect led instead of lead.

In recent years the rise in the crime rate has lead to increased concern on the part of both the police and the general public.

While these are just a few examples the number of results on a Google search is impressively high:

I pondered if using have lead to could mean that someone "has a lead position" and the preposition to introduces a comparison, i.e. subordinate person. But I don't think so. At least the cited example and the sentences in the link contain typos or even grammatical errors.

Hence I wonder if there is any specific in have/has lead to or if just too many people don't know that the past participle of lead is led?

share|improve this question
It's probably a spelling mistake as none of the dictionaries list lead but led as the past and past participle of lead. So it should be led not lead. – Noah Jul 17 '12 at 10:57
"could of" has 43.5 million hits according to Google ( tinyurl.com/7h96tsy ). I wouldn't be impressed by search engine stats if I were you :) You might find Google Trends a more meaningful use of your time ( tinyurl.com/cxyen87 ) – coleopterist Jul 17 '12 at 13:34
It's probably just a spelling mistake, based on the conjugation read, read, have read (which rhyme with lead, led, have led, plead, pled, have pled). Note that have plead also has a large number of Google hits. – Peter Shor Jun 12 '14 at 22:56
@PeterShor I think so, too. Snailboat already mentioned that in another comment. Unfortunately, nobody has given this as an answer yet. – Em1 Jun 13 '14 at 8:36

It should be 'led'.

verb (past and past participle led /lɛd/)

The confusion is that the soft grey metal they used to make pipes out of is spelled 'lead', but pronounced 'led'.

share|improve this answer
You think the problem occurs because people confuse leadership with lead pipes? That's definitely a fringe conspiracy theory. – jwpat7 Jul 17 '12 at 16:23
I think the problem occurs because two words sound the same and have similar spelling. Where is the conspiracy in that? – Roaring Fish Jul 18 '12 at 0:35
It's also possible the confusion comes from association with 'read', which has the past and past participle 'read' rather than 'red'. – snailplane Jan 22 '13 at 20:49

It should say "have led," but, given rapid demise of irregular verb forms, I am grateful if it does not say, "have leaded."

share|improve this answer
By rapid, you mean the movement between the weak and strong forms that have been happening over the last 1,000 years? – Jon Hanna Jun 12 '14 at 16:51
Since pleaded is currently changing to pled, I don't see why led should be simultaneously changing to leaded. – Peter Shor Jun 12 '14 at 23:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.