Please elaborate, when we say "who is", why does it sound "whiz"?
Also one more example I would like to include: why "visit us" sounds "visi-tas"?
|
Please elaborate, when we say "who is", why does it sound "whiz"? Also one more example I would like to include: why "visit us" sounds "visi-tas"? |
|||||||||||||
|
|
There is a concept in phonetics known as elision, whereby a sound or group of sounds is omitted to ease pronunciation. For example: ice tea, which should be iced tea. As a further example, where I am from, it is not uncommon to hear "m'ungry" instead of "I'm hungry." Because we eliminate unstressed sounds, I'd wager to say that that would be why "who is" comes out more like "whiz." Edit: To further answer your second example, that is known as linking, another example of connected speech. |
|||
|
|
|
First of all, I've never heard such an assimilation in England or the parts of America I visit. Where are you hearing "Whiz"? The more usual contraction is who is -> who's, which sounds like "hooz". |
|||
|
|
|
There is enough phonemic variation among speakers of English to make many vowels sound to some listeners like something else entirely. Usually fast speech and lazy enunciation are the culprits, but that is how people usually speak in normal, casual conversion, myself included. This can make it hard for non-native speakers to understand all the words. And this is true of any language. Native listeners don't listen to each phoneme one by one; instead they post-process entire phrases, and because they can do this very rapidly they have no trouble parsing the meaning. |
|||
|