Books and other things with the same name

Question

Is it proper to say "the book and movie Of Mice and Men" even though the two identical terms "Of Mice and Men" do not refer to the same entity?

An alternative would be "the book Of Mice and Men and the movie Of Mice and Men", which strikes me as very awkward.

If the first phrasing is valid, does that imply that "the book and man Abraham Lincoln" would be OK too? Secondarily, if so, could "Abraham Lincoln" be italicized?

This seems much less likely for practical reasons although the man and the book are arguably as distinct from one another as the movie and the book are, above.

Answer 1

That is an interesting question. I think there is a spectrum between two parallel and identical things at one end, and two things completely different but with the same name at the other. The former is like:

"I saw and conquered Gaul"

This is common and regular ellipsis; you leave out the common part in two parallel phrases. The latter is often a figure of speech and is called zeugma. That means "yoke" in Greek, because you use part of a phrase as a yoke to control two things that are very different, but somehow both fit the yoke.

Consider this sentence:

"I hit the roof with my head and Emma with a glass bottle".

The verb "to hit" has two different meanings - to hit by accident versus to hit on purpose -, both of which take an object, but the objects each serve a different function. And both verbs take an instrument; but the instrument "with my head" is accidental, whereas "with a bottle" is on purpose. This twist of meanings gives a quaint effect, which can be decorative in some texts, but will be misleading or inappropriate in formal or business texts, where rectitude and efficiency rule.

In your first example, the book and the film are not completely identical, but they are close enough not to surprise the reader, so I'd say your phrase is fine. In the second example, the meanings of the two names lie farther apart; that makes it more striking and playful. If you aim at a playful tone, use it; if a playful tone is not intended, your phrase goes too far. Italicising Abraham Lincoln would not be a good idea: then one half of the yoke would not fit any more. For you cannot italicise a person, while not italicising a book title is acceptable. Think of it as "the man Abraham Lincoln and the book Abraham Lincoln" versus "the man Abraham Lincoln and the book Abraham Lincoln".

Answer 2

I would, instead, say/write one of the following:

• the book, Of Mice and Men, and the movie based on it

• the book, Of Mice and Men, and the movie with the same title

• the book, Of Mice and Men, and the movie, Of Mice and Men,

• the movie, Of Mice and Men, and the book on which it is based

• the movie and the book both titled Of Mice and Men

• both the book and movie, Of Mice and Men,

When dealing with both a person/group and the movie/book/album/product/brand/thing named after them, the word eponymous comes in handy. Thus:

• Abraham Lincoln and the eponymous book

If the book were written by Abraham Lincoln himself, then:

• Abraham Lincoln and his eponymous book