Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If I form a sentence like:

I could read the book if I hadn't wasted my time.

Would it be considered a past perfect sentence with the part I could read the book being in simple past for context in the sentence or does it only show a possibility?

share|improve this question

3 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Your sentence is grammatical as written but to make it grammatical the meaning may or may not need to be changed from your original intent.

Suppose you had been given several jobs to get done earlier in the day but instead of doing them you wasted your time. Now, later, you wish to read a book but because you had wasted your time earlier you must spend your time finishing your assigned chores instead of being able to read your book. So you say,

I could read my book [now] if I hadn't wasted my time [earlier].

share|improve this answer
In the sentence, Does the 'now' mean I'm saying this right now or If I could it read 'now'? I'm a bit confused. – user963241 Jun 24 '12 at 7:43
@user963241- It's both. If I hadn't been goofing around earlier, I could be reading my book right now. – Jim Jun 24 '12 at 16:07

No, it has to be:

I could have read the book if I hadn’t wasted my time.

Because you need both halves of an if–then construct to show up in the same perfectness, so to speak.

share|improve this answer

Your example is not grammatical.

Let us reword your sentence as follow:

*If I hadn't wasted my time, I could read the book.

Now, it is clear that the sentence consider an imagined situation (If I hadn't wasted my time) and the possible result of this situation (*I could read the book.)

In other terms, your sentence is a "conditional sentence."

In this light, you have to follow the rules governing the associated grammatical structures, which in your case are referred to the third conditional.

We use the third conditional when we imagine a different past, where something did or did not happen, and we imagine a different result.

The form of the third conditional is the following:

conditional clauseif + past perfect

main clausemodal verb with future-in-the-past meaning (should/would/might/could) + have + [ed] form

That said, your sentence does not follow the above rules and it must be rewritten as follow:

If I hadn't wasted my time, I could have read the book.

or

I could have read the book if I hadn't wasted my time.

Reference: English Grammar Today, Cambridge.

share|improve this answer
I thought with your initial reword that you were going to make the point that it is grammatical. But then you didn't. – Jim Jun 23 '12 at 17:26
@Jim: I reworded the sentence to give evidence to the fact that that considers an imagined situation. To avoid confusion I used the symbol '*' before the sentence. – Carlo_R. Jun 23 '12 at 17:32
Now, I bolded the "have" in the lasts sentences to prevent confusion. @Jim – Carlo_R. Jun 23 '12 at 17:34
@Carlo_R- see my answer. This is where I thought you were headed with your answer. – Jim Jun 23 '12 at 17:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.