Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am never quite sure whether to use nevertheless or nonetheless; they seem almost synonymous to me, but I think I might be missing a subtle distinction. Is there a difference, and if so, how do I determine which is right in different circumstances?

I am specifically thinking of sentences like this:

  • I am busy Saturday, nevertheless I will come to your party anyway.
  • I am busy Saturday, nonetheless I will come to your party anyway.

There is a question here that deals with a specific idiomatic usage, but I was thinking of the general type of usage, as given in the party example above.

share|improve this question

3 Answers

The regular MW dictionary entry for nonetheless actually just says "nevertheless," and I'm not personally familiar with a situation when you could justifiably use one but not the other.

According to merriam-webster.com's Learner's Dictionary, they have the same definition as well:

in spite of what has just been said

…although nonetheless is marked as somewhat formal, while nevertheless is not.

share|improve this answer

Nonetheless is used when talking about an amount of something.

He really botched it tonight. I love him nonetheless.

Here we are saying that the amount I love him has not been diminished from the level I loved him prior to his having botched it.

Nevertheless should be used when talking about doing something despite the facts.

It could be dangerous. Nevertheless, I've got to try.

Here we are saying that I will try despite the fact that it could be dangerous.

Note though that quite often interchanging the words results in a sentence with a different nuance of meaning but the same overall outcome.

Switching to nevertheless in my first example changes the meaning from I don't love him any less to I love him despite the facts - very similar but not quite the same.

And this is why interchanging them works so often. Because usually when saying that the amount that I do something has not diminished in any way it is because something has occurred that had the possibility of diminishing it and in not diminishing the amount I have essentially done that despite the facts.

share|improve this answer
1  
I don't find the slightest hint of the distinction you are making, in my understanding of the sentences. Perhaps it's a dialect thing. – Colin Fine Jun 22 '12 at 10:04
I kind of see where you are coming from here. You are proposing that "I love him nonetheless" means essentially "The amount less that I love him is none." (Now there is an ugly sentence.) I'm not convinced, though. Can you expand a little? – Fraser Orr Jun 22 '12 at 14:03
@ColinFine: Here is an example where I think the meaning is clear: "Julius II loved him nonetheless for it..." means Julius didn't love him any less because of it. – Jim Jun 22 '12 at 15:13
1  
@Jim. Ah. I see the problem. That is not the word nonetheless: it is the phrase none the less. To see the difference, consider Julius did not love him any the less. There is no word anytheless. – Colin Fine Jun 25 '12 at 23:34

I think in analyzing the two words nonetheless and nevertheless, we should separate the different parts and ask what the meanings of never and none are.

  • None means “nothing” or “the absence of”.
  • Never means “impossible”.

So I ask you, is the distinction between never and none clear?

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.