Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 49 down vote favorite
10

We wear a shirt, a jacket but a pair of pants.

Why is pants plural?

share|improve this question
5  
Well, a "pant" would only be good for one leg... just like a "short", a "trouser"... – user730 Dec 21 '10 at 9:36
5  
@J. M.: A shirt also has two arms, but we don't call it a "shirts". The question is why "pants", "shorts", "trousers", "knickers" etc. are plural, even though each of them is just an ordinary single piece of clothing. – ShreevatsaR Dec 21 '10 at 10:11
Perhaps the question should be whether all nouns that end in 's' are always plural in some form. – Joost Schuur Dec 21 '10 at 11:27
2  
+1 for inadvertently hilarious title – Claudiu Dec 21 '10 at 16:04
2  
@Claudiu: hilarious, but I doubt it was inadvertent! – PLL Dec 21 '10 at 21:57
show 1 more comment

5 Answers

up vote 56 down vote accepted

A quick search led me to the excellent site World Wide Words run by Michael Quinion

The site has an entire page on this issue. Here's a brief snippet.

Before the days of modern tailoring, such garments, whether underwear or outerwear, were indeed made in two parts, one for each leg. The pieces were put on each leg separately and then wrapped and tied or belted at the waist (just like cowboys’ chaps). The plural usage persisted out of habit even after the garments had become physically one piece. However, a shirt was a single piece of cloth, so it was always singular.

share|improve this answer
Brilliant! Thanks. – glenstorey Dec 22 '10 at 1:00
2  
Watch movies based in old England and you'll see examples of clothes where the sleeves and pants were separate and tied or fastened on. – Greg Dec 22 '10 at 6:14
up vote 3 down vote

Apparently in the past they were two tube weakly linked, think to current tights. Hence the plural form.

share|improve this answer
I think there is something about wearing a pair of pants or something like that. – Eldroß Dec 21 '10 at 10:00
Yes but the question is, why a pair of pants is a single object? A pair of shoes is a couple of separate objects. – Uberto Dec 21 '10 at 10:12
What, no, a pair of shoes is singular just as a pair of pants is. Look at the pronouns you just used! If you're talking about whether the parts of the whole can be used separately, well, just cut a pair of pants in half and you have yourself a pant and a pant. – SilverbackNet Dec 21 '10 at 22:01
not singular, single object as in one inseparable object... well mine for sure. ;) – Uberto Dec 21 '10 at 22:33
up vote 1 down vote

In my English class (I'm German), I learned that it is called "a pair of trousers". Maybe it is the same for those "shoes"?

share|improve this answer
Ooops, I misunderstood the initial question :-( Sorry! – Uwe Keim Dec 21 '10 at 15:34
4  
Also, trousers is the British, while pants is the American. Pants used in the British has the same meaning as underpants in the American. – Jimi Oke Dec 21 '10 at 16:37
And I love the British expression "mad as pants". – MT_Head May 18 '11 at 7:08
up vote 0 down vote

I think it just like the "shoes". You cannot have one "shoe" as well as one "part" of the pants.

share|improve this answer
14  
Speak for yourself. I have both a left shoe and a right shoe. – Eric Dec 21 '10 at 11:16
Just my thought, that normally, will you wear just one left (or right) shoe when you are going out? – Ngoc Pham Dec 27 '10 at 8:30
1  
It depends. If he only needs one step to get the mail, he might only put on the shoe for the foot necessary for the task? – Andrew J. Brehm Jan 16 '12 at 7:29
up vote 0 down vote

It's referring to the components that make up the whole. A pair of pants consists of two pants. Much like a pair of glasses (usually) has two pieces of glass.

share|improve this answer
1  
But that doesn't explain why. Other languages manage perfectly well making them singular. – Colin Fine Dec 22 '10 at 17:58

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.