English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Is it “5-6 weeks are a lot of time” or “5-6 weeks is a lot of time”?

I am writing about a baseball player who has 33 at-bats in his career.

Which is correct:

Yes, 33 career at-bats qualifies/qualify as a small sample size.

My guess is that it should be qualify because at-bats is the subject, but it sounds odd.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by FumbleFingers, JeffSahol, simchona, kiamlaluno, Daniel Jun 27 '12 at 23:02

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

The subject is 33 career at-bats - which is plural, so qualify is the correct verb form. But people will often use singular qualifies in a context like this, where that number of "at-bats" is alternatively described as (singular) "a small sample size". – FumbleFingers Jun 18 '12 at 17:20
A similar question: 5 weeks is vs 5 weeks are – J.R. Jun 18 '12 at 17:24

The argument could be made that there's an implicit 'having' in the sentence:

Yes, [having] 33 career at-bats qualifies as a small sample size.

If you buy this argument, then the implicit 'having' is the gerund subject, and the verb for this gerund subject should be in singular form.

share|improve this answer

qualifies. the noun is "33 career at-bats" which is singular.

If the subject were "33 at-bats in one's career," it would be "qualify"

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.