|
Can I say the following?
I know I could join the sentences into one sentence to get the same meaning. I want to know if this would be correct if I write it this way? In this, the doorbell ringing comes after he finished his meal. |
||||
|
|
|
Correct. Nothing wrong with the way you have written it. Except I'd write "doorbell" as one word. |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
I would say not correct. The second sentence, "he had finished his meal", isn't really a complete sentence, in terms of being one coherent thought. It needs a time phrase such as "when the doorbell rang". I know you have that, but putting a full-stop between them separates the ideas. |
|||
|
|
|
Correct probably isn't a helpful word in this context. There are three possibilities: The doorbell rang. He had finished his meal (1); The doorbell rang; he had finished his meal (2): and The doorbell rang after he had finished his meal (3) *. All three are grammatical, and express the same sequence of events, but the implications are subtly different. (1) implies no connection at all: The doorbell rang. The sun had gone down. At the Palace, the American President was making a speech. As such, it's probably bad style, unless you are simply setting the scene. (2) explicitly connects the ideas, and the reader would expect some explanation; perhaps he disliked interrupted meals, but was now prepared to answer the door. (3) emphasises the ring at the door, and puts it in a context. That's the thing about English; there are usually several ways to put a sentence, but only one way to express your thought properly. * Actually, there are many ways to rephrase it, but most of them boil down to one of the three. |
|||||
|
|
Yep, nothing wrong with that. It would probably more clear to merge it into one sentence, but it does work passably. You should try and use more descriptive titles by the way. |
|||
|
|
