English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've just seen this sentence on the internet...

You don't get another chance. Life is no Nintendo game.

If I had to say something like that, I would say "Life is not a Nintendo game."

Why did he say "no"? What is more correct? and what is the difference?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Janus Bahs Jacquet, Rory Alsop, RyeɃreḁd, MrHen, cornbread ninja 麵包忍者 Oct 25 '13 at 2:53

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. A list of these references can be found here: List of general references" – Janus Bahs Jacquet, Rory Alsop, RyeɃreḁd, cornbread ninja 麵包忍者
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

See also english.stackexchange.com/questions/7744/… – GEdgar Jun 17 '12 at 17:13
possible duplicate of "Does not make changes" or "makes no changes" – jwpat7 Jun 17 '12 at 17:24
possible duplicate of "There is no rule" vs. "there isn't rule" – MrHen Oct 24 '13 at 14:27

This is a common idiom that is subtly different from the regular use of no and not. It’s used to make a comparison against an ideal or standard thing, and is often used to compare skills:

He’s no “king of comedy”, but Dane Cook can make people laugh.

Michael Bublé is a pretty good singer, but he’s no Frank Sinatra.

Your example sentence is saying you don’t get another chance because life is not a Nintendo game—though ideally it would be, because everybody wants a second chance at life.

This is also used with negative descriptions to cast someone in a positive light. “She’s no fool” means “she’s actually very wise/savvy”. Occasionally you also see it used in a rhetorical way, to give the reader a negative expectation but “surprise” them with a positive description:

He’s no Nikola Tesla—he’s even smarter than that!

share|improve this answer

Neither is more correct. They both mean the same thing, however using "no" gives it more intriguing feel, and "not a" gives a cold definite statement.

share|improve this answer

When a noun has an non-gradable meaning (it is either something or it is not) we cannot use "no" + noun.

A potato is not a fruit.
A potato is no fruit.

When a noun has a gradable meaning, "no" + noun means the same as "not a/an" + noun:

It's no secret that we are interested. (=It's not a secret. A secret is gradable. Something can be more of a secret than something else.)

In the context you have provided I suppose that one can give only an opinion on how a Nintendo game, metaphorically speaking, is, so:

You don't get another chance. Life is not a Nintendo game.


You don't get another chance. Life is no Nintendo game.

are both correct.

Reference: English Grammar Today (Cambridge)

share|improve this answer

He is no Albert Einstein - In this case Albert Einstein becomes a type of person. ( Smart people can be compared to Albert Einstein. He is not among those people)

He is not Albert Einstein - In this case we are talking about Albert Einstein the person. ( He is John Smith, not Albert Einstein )

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.