English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a group that is named "Service Group". Within that service group, there are service sub-groups. Within those service sub-groups, there is another level down. Is there another word that is better than "Service Sub-Sub-Group"? I wanted to avoid using level 1, level 2, etc. since sub-group sounds more intuitive.

share|improve this question
One way to handle this problem is by not referring to everything as a "group." For example, you could call it the "Service Division"; then, you might divide a Division into Sections, and then divide Sections into Groups (or whatever nomenclature you want to use). – J.R. Jun 12 '12 at 0:37
its a sub of another sub-group hence a sub-sub-group: stick with it! – user114794 Mar 24 '15 at 15:15
up vote 3 down vote accepted

You can solve this problem by using different names for each level of the hierarchy. For example, instead of calling it the Service Group, you might call it the Service Division. A Division could be divided into Branches, Branches into Sections, Sections into Groups, and Groups into Teams (or whatever nomenclature you want to use).

share|improve this answer

I think the word you're looking for is tertiary, of the third order, rank, stage, formation, etc.; third.

You'd have the group, the sub group and the tertiary group.

share|improve this answer
I should have said the same thing @rudra said. I don't know know why that answer was downvoted. – TecBrat Jun 22 '12 at 22:23

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.