Sign up ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Does indiscrete make sense in the following sentence? Is this word used as synonym of indissoluble?

The instincts and conduct of the young man who aspires to the eminence of a dukedom, from which he seems hopefully removed by the precedence of several relatives and an indiscrete marriage which his mother made, are elegant and impeccable.

The New York Times, Books (Alec Guinness Plays 8 Roles in 'Kind Hearts and Coronets," at Trans-Lux 60th Street).

Oxford Dictionaries, indiscrete: "not divided into distinct parts".

share|improve this question

4 Answers 4

up vote 4 down vote accepted

It seems to me this is more likely to be a misprint for indiscreet — lacking discretion; unwise.

IMDb has this for the plot of Kind Hearts and Coronets:

Louis Mazzini's mother belongs to the aristocratic family D'Ascoyne, but she ran away with an opera singer. Therefore, she and Louis were rejected by the D'Ascoynes. Once adult, Louis decides to avenges his mother and him, by becoming the next Duke of the family. Murdering every potential successor is clearly the safest way to achieve his goal...

...and I guess an opera singer was thought to be rather infra dig.

share|improve this answer

They've used the wrong word:

indiscreet: not discreet; imprudent or tactless

is the word they meant to use.

share|improve this answer
+1. Most likely. Both discrete and discreet have the same origin and pronounciation, BTW. – CesarGon Jun 2 '12 at 18:58
Also note DavidC's observation that he was probably hopelessly removed, not hopefully removed from the dukedom. – Adam Dec 9 '14 at 18:47

To say that a marriage was indiscreet was a polite way of saying that it lowered the social status of the one entering into it. How exactly this makes it harder for the young man to receive a heritary title is not clear to me.

Also, I think the author meant to say that the young man was "hopelessly removed" not "hopefully removed" from a dukedom.

share|improve this answer
This is wrong. A marriage which lowers social status might be indiscreet, not indiscrete (as other answers point out). – Andrew Leach Dec 9 '14 at 19:25
@AndrewLeach Thanks, I will correct the spelling error. It looks like I copied it from the original quote. – DavidC Dec 12 '14 at 17:38

While it is likely that you would use indiscreet to describe a marriage (and it is likely that this is the context in which it was meant in the above quote,) it is also entirely possible to describe a marriage as indiscrete, which would be the same as describing a marriage as indivisible.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.