English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was looking into my dictionary that lists many uses of the verb bash but always transitive ones.

According to that, I would expect to say:

He bashed him.
He bashed the chair.

But I can see examples on the Internet saying e.g.:

I'm not gonna bash on people for speeding through.

How come? Why not just "bash people"?

share|improve this question
For the same reason that some people say "beat up on" rather than "beat ... up"? And some people say "meet up with" rather than "meet"? And "listen up" for "listen"? I've not heard "bash on", but it doesn't surprise me. – Colin Fine May 25 '12 at 12:13

See also Origin of "hating on" .

Adding "on" to an action is a construction popularized by hip-hop music and culture.

share|improve this answer

To me, the "on" adds meaning to the phrase "bash on" or "beat on": it tends to indicate that the action is ongoing, or not complete.

I bashed on the hood of the 1959 Galaxie Fairlane with my fist.

says that I (futilely) beat on the the hood.

I bashed the hood of the Prius.

says the hood is definitely bashed in.

share|improve this answer

Not to bash on the bloggers, but that sounds rather informal to me. Ngrams indicates the literature is much more well-disciplined.

enter image description here Note: Flipping through the results found for "bash on" (the yellow line) reveals mostly hits where the word is not being used that way (e.g., "We're all going to the bash on Friday.")

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.