Is there a difference between suited to and suited for? For example,
Japan is suited for agriculture.
Agriculture is suited to Japan.
In my above examples, can I interchange for with to? I feel like there is a difference, but I cannot figure it out.
Tell me more
×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for
linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.
|
|
||||
|
|
Suited to mean right for someone or something may be used with to or for.
means that Japan is right for agriculture, while
means that agriculture is right for Japan. |
|||
|
