English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there a difference between suited to and suited for? For example,

Japan is suited for agriculture.

Agriculture is suited to Japan.

In my above examples, can I interchange for with to? I feel like there is a difference, but I cannot figure it out.

share|improve this question

Suited to mean right for someone or something may be used with to or for.

Japan is suited to/for agriculture

means that Japan is right for agriculture, while

Agriculture is suited to/for Japan

means that agriculture is right for Japan.

share|improve this answer
Hmm.. reading the links Cameron posted makes me feel that they are not interchangeable, i.e., "Japan is suited to agriculture" would be wrong. – Jesse Good May 22 '12 at 1:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.