English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it right to write

There is no money needed, but only time.

when I am trying to express that money isn't required for a particular thing, only time is required?

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The conjunction isn't necessary and introduces awkwardness. You could simply say:

There is no money needed (or required), only time.

or

No money is needed/required, only time.

share|improve this answer
1  
ooh.. yeah! sure :D – user19341 May 12 '12 at 12:36
    
Some people would insist on a semicolon or a dash there over a comma. – tchrist May 13 '12 at 13:51

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.