Sign up ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is it right to write

There is no money needed, but only time.

when I am trying to express that money isn't required for a particular thing, only time is required?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The conjunction isn't necessary and introduces awkwardness. You could simply say:

There is no money needed (or required), only time.


No money is needed/required, only time.

share|improve this answer
ooh.. yeah! sure :D – user19341 May 12 '12 at 12:36
Some people would insist on a semicolon or a dash there over a comma. – tchrist May 13 '12 at 13:51

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.