English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can excerpt and excerption replace each other in a particular sentence without changing its meaning? For example, given these two sentences:

  1. He presented excerpts from William James' philosophical writings.
  2. He presented excerptions from William James' philosophical writings.

Do both these nouns give the same meaning or change the sense in any way? Or is either of these two sentences wrong?

share|improve this question
Don't know if it's wrong, but the second would be very uncommon and a lot of people would probably think you were mixing up "excerpts" and "exceptions" – Kevin May 9 '12 at 14:07

According to the OED, excerption refers to the act of taking an excerpt, so it's kind of a "meta" word. Sentence 2 above would be strange in that context. The use of excerption to mean an extract or an excerpt is archaic.

share|improve this answer

They do not seem to be same but both are nouns. Excerpt means a shorter text selected from a larger text. Excerption means the act of taking an excerpt.


http://www.audioenglish.net/dictionary/excerpt.htm and


suggest that both may mean the same but excerption is very rarely used. It seems you picked your examples from here.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.