Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Possible Duplicate:
What is the correct way to pluralize an acronym?

My company deals in Purchase Orders.

For years they have referred to multiple purchase orders as POs. It seems, the proper spelling would be POes, because a P-O is referred to as a noun by everyone in the company, even though it is an abbreviated form of Purchase Order.

Which is correct? POs or POes ?

share|improve this question
    
See FumbleFingers' answer to a similar question –  zpletan May 8 '12 at 20:22
add comment

marked as duplicate by Marthaª, Mehper C. Palavuzlar, Mitch, jwpat7, Matt Эллен May 9 '12 at 8:12

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

3 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Because PO is an abbreviation, it just gets an -s: POs. It's not the same as potato or tomato, which would get -es.

See Oxford: "Just add -s (or -es, if the noun in question forms its plural with -es). For example: MPs ... An apostrophe should never be used to form the plural of ordinary nouns, names, abbreviations, or numerical dates."

So: POs because order takes a simple s. And not PO's with an apostrophe.

However, I believe the Chicago Manual of Style does advocate using an apostrophe (but I don't have a reference for that, if it's online at all).

share|improve this answer
    
So if the abbreviation was, say, GT for green tomato, are you saying the plural should be GTes? Or black ox becomes BOen? Looks wrong to me. Do you have any real-life examples where -es (or other non-s) us added? –  Hugo May 9 '12 at 6:54
    
See Alex B.'s answer for a CMOS reference: apostrophe only used for lowercase letters such as x's. –  Hugo May 9 '12 at 7:03
    
@Hugo: I wondered about quoting the whole thing. I can't say I agree with their reckoning on -es, and I find it difficult to think of real-world examples. Even "Co" for "Company" would look awkward as "Coes". Perhaps what Oxford published there is now anachronistic. There are other conventions too: in Canon Law, if you abbreviate Canon as Can then an acceptable plural is Cann, and that method can be used with others as well. –  Andrew Leach May 9 '12 at 8:00
    
Reading the Oxford page, it's a page about when to add apostrophes, not specifically about how to pluralise abbreviations. I don't think they're suggesting at all that plural abbreviations should ever have -es. They're saying add -s (without apostrophe) to make a plural noun, or -es (without apostrophe) if the noun is made plural with -es. –  Hugo May 9 '12 at 9:44
add comment

A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (1985) clearly states that abbreviations (understood broadly) get an -s (or 's, which was much commoner in the past). Section 5.81 (V)

The Chicago Manual of Style (16 th. ed.) says that "abbreviations usually form the plural by adding s. To aid comprehension, lowercase letters form the plural with an apostrophe and an s." (Section 7.14)

UFOs, CEOs, CFOs, CBOs, IRAs, URLs, BSs, MAs, PhDs etc. but x's and y's

The only exception I'm aware of is OSes.

share|improve this answer
    
Do you have a reference to show OSes is an exception? An answer (linked in the question comments) says OSs is most common –  Hugo May 9 '12 at 7:00
add comment

It is POs, or more correctly P.O.s, since the plural is for the abbreviated word rather than the word "PO".

share|improve this answer
3  
Can you please give a reference? –  zpletan May 8 '12 at 20:24
    
There are only a few instances where "...os" is wrong and "...oes" must be used, and those words are already established. ESL @ About.com. Since "PO" (in this question) is not a word and has not been established to be one that must use the "es" it would use a single "s". –  BillyNair May 8 '12 at 20:35
    
I agree it is POs, but adding periods to abbreviations is somewhat old-fashioned in these acronym-heavy times. –  Hugo May 9 '12 at 6:57
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.