English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know that a fascination 'holds' the individual, but how does one phrase the act of being fascinated? i.e.; does one 'hold' or does one 'have' a fascination?

Would it be more appropriate to say that he or she is 'held' by a fascination?

share|improve this question
Is there a way that you can say that sentence more specifically how you are trying to use it? (ie. "She was held by a fascination of the otters, and wouldn't leave the zoo.") – BillyNair May 8 '12 at 20:27
@BillyNair "In those days I held - and still hold – a fascination with [...]" vs "In those days I had – and still have – a fascination with [...]" – bradleygriffith May 8 '12 at 20:41
Do you, @bradleygriffith, take this fascination, to have and to hold, ... – Kaz May 8 '12 at 22:23
up vote 4 down vote accepted

I (native U.S. speaker) would use is fascinated with or is fascinated by.

As a child, I was fascinated with with any kind of button I could press. While these days I am fascinated by touch-screen technology, I miss the satisfying click of a button.

If forced to use have or held I could use either depending on which is the subject and which is the object:

Vampire romances hold no fascination for me. I have no fascination with the undead.

share|improve this answer

Yes, held is more appropriate.

He is held by a fascination of sailing in the sea.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.