Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question often pops up when writing scientific articles. Which of the two is preferred?

This issue is described in detail in Section 4.

or

This issue will be described in detail in Section 4.

(Assuming, of course, that the current Section is 3.)

Can anybody also give reasons? Please note that English is my second language.

share|improve this question
    
possible duplicate of What (grammatical) tense to use when doing reference in a paper? –  KitFox May 4 '12 at 12:23
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 7 down vote accepted

I think either is acceptable if both are in the same document and thus presumably published at the same time. The present tense is from the point of view that the entire document is there, available to read. The future tense is from the point of view that the reader is progressing through the sections in order and hasn't gotten to later sections yet.

For a reference book which is not intended to be read cover to cover, but rather in which the reader will refer to sections as the need arises, I'd make all references present tense.

So you can use either, but be consistent. Also be consistent between forward and backward references. That is, don't make references to later chapters in the future tense but references to previous chapters in the present tense. Either make them all present tense, or make forward references future and backward references past.

If you are referring to something not yet published, use the future. Like, "This will be discussed in the next issue of our newsletter."

share|improve this answer
add comment

I assume section 3 and section 4 have both been published. In that case, it depends on the writer's intention. The first gives the impression that the reader may go straight to section 4 and be able to understand it without first finishing section 3, the second that section 4 will only make sense after the reader has finished section 3.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.