Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the semantic difference between encipher and encrypt?

share|improve this question

migrated from stackoverflow.com Apr 29 '12 at 15:56

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

    
I have never read any piece where the difference between the two made a difference. encipher |enˈsīfər| verb [ trans. ] convert (a message or piece of text) into a coded form; encrypt. –  Pascal Cuoq Jan 27 '10 at 11:32
    
Well, the semantic difference is that they are different words. One has the ending of ... I'm going to assume you didn't mean "semantic" but "technical" difference. So the technical difference is, there isn't one. They are the same thing. Only, almost no-one uses the word "encipher". So stick to "encrypt". –  Noon Silk Jan 27 '10 at 11:32
    
Different word = syntactic difference. Different meaning = semantic difference. Semantic is the right word in the question. –  ewernli Jan 27 '10 at 11:38
    
@ewernli: Well sure, if you want to get all semantic about it :P –  Noon Silk Jan 27 '10 at 11:39
    
Actually, encipher was the original correct term; "encrypt" has only more recently become popular in the lexicon. –  BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft Jan 27 '10 at 15:13

5 Answers 5

There are a number of differences depending on context:

  1. In cryptology encipher and encrypt are synonymous. There was an effort a few years ago to stop using the root word crypt and use the root cipher instead because some cultures associate the root crypt with death (tales from the crypt). Hence encrypt = to kill. This change never really caught on. In terms of use certain uses of the words are preferred to others. For example: "one 'encrypts' plaintext with a cipher", rather than "one 'enciphers' plaintext with an 'encryption'".

  2. Outside of cryptology decipherment refers to decoding or understanding codes and languages that are not designed to keep secrets but are unknown. For example determining the genetic code or figuring out how to translate mayan.

The answer that Justice gave is incorrect:

"If one 'enciphers,' then one is using reversible cryptography. If one 'encrypts,' then one might be using either reversible cryptography or irreversible cryptography".

While cryptology contains reversible function and non-reversible 'one-way' functions, the term encryption/decryption explicitly refers only to reversible functions.

"In cryptography, encryption is the process of transforming information (referred to as plaintext) using an algorithm (called cipher) to make it unreadable to anyone except those possessing special knowledge, usually referred to as a key." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encryption

share|improve this answer
up vote 5 down vote accepted

In French, there are two words, "chiffrer" and "crypter"; theoretically, the latter would mean "to encrypt but without knowledge of the key, i.e. as part of an attack" (it is more often encountered as "décrypter" which means "to decrypt without prior knowledge of the key"). Relatively few French-speaking programmers are even aware of that distinction, and the French translations of many applications (including Outlook Express) use "crypter" in places where they should use "chiffrer".

In English, I do not think that this distinction actually exists. "Encipher" and "chiffrer" both come from the Arabic "sifr" which means "zero", while "encrypt" and "crypter" come from the Greek "kryptos" (hidden, secret). The use of "sifr" can apparently be traced back to Giovan Battista Bellaso, who published in 1553 cryptographic methods in Latin (as was normal at the time) but with Italian titles such as "La Cifra" and "Novi et singolari modi di cifrare". His point was that his cryptographic techniques involved some computations with numbers, and in 16th century Italy, mathematics was still an import from old Greek by way of Arab writers, brought to Christian Europe during the Crusades. Hence the use of the Arabic root.

In that sense, one could say that "to encipher" means "to encrypt, with some mathematics involved in the process". By definition, this covers any encryption in which a computer was used, so the terms "encipher" and "encrypt" are practically synonymous.

share|improve this answer

There is not any difference as such, in non-technical usage, a 'cipher' is the same thing as a 'code'; however, the concepts are distinct in cryptography. In classical cryptography, ciphers are distinguished from codes.

Codes generally substitute different length strings of characters in the output, while the ciphers generally substitute the same number of characters as are in the input.

Source: Wikipedia.

share|improve this answer

Semantically speaking, the following may be inaccurate. However, I'll leave it here for future reference.

I've worked in a project where to encipher a piece of data, you would actually use the decryption function of the cipher. (The reason was to save on hardware implementation costs.) In order to be clear on the operation you wanted to perform on the data, encipher would mean to transform plaintext into ciphertext and decipher would mean to transform ciphertext into plaintext.

For example, I would encipher a piece of data by decrypting that data with cipher X. I would also decipher a piece of data by decrypting that data with cipher X. (This is possible because the data is exchanged with another device that can only use the encryption function of cipher X.)

share|improve this answer

Cryptography includes two basic kinds of operations: reversible cryptographic operations and irreversible cryptographic operations. The reversible cryptographic operations are also known as ciphers, while the irreversible cryptographic operations are also known as hash algorithms or digests.

From my own observations on common usage and abusage: If one "enciphers," then one is using reversible cryptography. If one "encrypts," then one might be using either reversible cryptography or irreversible cryptography.

Whether this distinction has any technical merit, and whether this distinction is in fact how the terms are commonly used, are questions that I am unable to answer.

share|improve this answer
    
In actual cryptographic work, the terms are synonymous, and we use them interchangeably. –  Mark Beadles Apr 30 '12 at 11:31

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.