English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I found the expression, “spend a lot of pixels” in the article titled “Handicapping the Veepstakes: Romney’s Rules of the Road” in today’s (April 25) Time magazine. It begins with:

“We’ve spent a lot of pixels analyzing some of Mitt Romney’s vice presidential options. There’s a reason for this, and it’s not simply because surveying the field and weighing the candidates’ strengths and weaknesses is a popular parlor game.”

I remember that Mitt Romney once mentioned “waste trees” to mean “waste papers.” What does ‘pixels’ represent for here? Is it TV time, or PC usage (for analysis)?

Is “spend a lot of pixels” a received expression today, or just the Time writer’s purple verse?

share|improve this question
Yoichi, a minor point: The usual cliche is purple prose instead of purple verse. Also see ngrams for purple verse,purple prose. – jwpat7 Apr 25 '12 at 21:23
@jwpat7, I caught myself writing purple prose in my answer. Edited to include both. – cornbread ninja 麵包忍者 Apr 25 '12 at 21:25
It's certainly not "becoming an idiom". I just typed it in to Google - which has probably been studying my Internet habits, since the first result was this question on ELU. But every one of the next 30 results was OP's exact quote. – FumbleFingers Apr 26 '12 at 0:28
We could be said to have spent a lot of keystrokes on what essentially is a non-idiom. – Kris Apr 26 '12 at 19:19

I'm not sure on what basis you would think this is a common phrase. It is a picturesque metaphor, but doesn't move the needle in the NGRAM viewer. (I have never heard it before, either.)

But that doesn't make it a meaningless phrase. You are on the right track, comparing it to dead trees. (News printed in newspapers tends to create a lot of dead trees. For some types of news, some people would consider this a waste of paper or dead trees.)

It holds a hint of irony, because "pixels" are not physical in the same sense that paper and trees are, so they can't be literally wasted in the same way. But it does convey that there is a waste. One similar phrase I hear in my business is "wasted bandwidth". This can be literal or metaphorical, meaning "waste of time".

share|improve this answer
I think that pixels are analogous to ink: ink on a sheet of paper, pixels on a monitor. – Paul Richter Apr 28 '12 at 1:30

The writer is referring to how much attention has been paid by TIME on Romney's campaign. Since that article series is web-only, it refers specifically to the visual medium used to pay the attention - pixels on the web.

This is not a received expression (though it could be gaining traction), it is as you say the writer's purple verse/prose.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.