English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I remember once coming upon an essay/article which, among other things, mentioned a (not uncommon) word whose technical definition was the state's act of officially removing a guilty person's right to life, prior to execution.

The first word that now comes to mind is condemn, but none of the definitions seems to fit what I remember. The word was not at all obscure. Is there another word more suitable? Or does one of condemn's meanings include this concept?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

You might want to consider using attaint (to pass judgment of death or outlawry upon) or attainder (the extinction of a person's civil rights resulting from a sentence of death). These aren't very common words, they're legalistic and they're both rather archaic. But I believe they mean almost exactly what you intend to convey.

share|improve this answer
This could very well be the answer - I had become familiar with this word through the phrase "Bill of Attainder" in the context of studying the US Constitution. The only caveat is that attaint usually pertains to loss of rights to property and titles. – Firstrock Apr 25 '12 at 3:16

Are you thinking of forfeiture of life? See this article entitled, "The Death Penalty and the Forfeiture Thesis" Here is an excerpt:

Death penalty retentionists often attempt to counter this argument by asserting that persons convicted of capital crimes have forfeited their right to life.

I'm not sure if this is an act of the state, though. It is more that, by their actions, those who commit capital crimes do the forfeiting.

share|improve this answer

Maybe outlawry? (Although declaring someone an outlaw was broader than your definition - it meant that not only the state, but anyone, was entitled to kill the person.)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.